IRU Circular 7/2026 — Implementing a specific national-list delisting decision
IRU Circular 7/2026 communicates a specific removal from the national list and requires supervised insurers to implement that decision. A delisting event must be reconciled against the current official list and the exact identifiers, not treated as permission to disable sanctions screening. Official sources and an evidence-led implementation checklist.
تعميم رقم (7) لسنة 2026 بشأن رفع بعض الاسماء من القائمة الوطنيةOfficial Arabic title
- Issued
- 23.04.2026
- Published
- 23.04.2026
- Guide reviewed
- 11.10.2026
- Instrument
- IRU Circular 7/2026
Action at a glance
What this instrument asks you to do
IRU Circular 7/2026 communicates a specific removal from the national list and requires supervised insurers to implement that decision. A delisting event must be reconciled against the current official list and the exact identifiers, not treated as permission to disable sanctions screening.
Source-backed
Stated legal requirements
Requirements below are attributed to the instrument or cited guidance; each item includes its source location.
- 01
Implement the committee's delisting decision dated 23 April 2026 for the names identified in the official circular.
Citation · Page 1, decision reference and operative paragraph
Dates and applicability
Timing, grace period and deadline
Timing
Signed and published 23 April. The circular gives no separate general grace period.
Grace period
Only the specifically stated submission period or validity condition applies. No additional general grace period is asserted.
Expit suggested practices
Build a reviewable closure record
These suggested actions are implementation practices, not additional legal requirements.
- 01
Reconcile the exact delisted records with the official decision.
- Suggested owner
- MLRO / sanctions reviewer
- Evidence to retain
- Decision copy, identifier comparison and dated list snapshot
- Complete when
- The reviewed record is the same person/entity as the decision, with other applicable lists checked.
- Expit support context
- Matching tools can assist reconciliation but cannot authorise release of restrictions.
- 02
Record and approve the effect on existing sanctions cases.
- Suggested owner
- Compliance and legal
- Evidence to retain
- Reasoned case disposition, reviewer approval and audit history
- Complete when
- Only the reviewed change is applied and ongoing screening remains active.
- Expit support context
- Case workflows can preserve the reason for a change rather than deleting the screening history.
Further clarification
Frequently asked questions
Can a delisting circular replace ongoing list monitoring?
No. It communicates a particular change; continuous monitoring and the current legal position still need to be checked.
Can Expit declare our implementing a specific national-list delisting decision gap closed?
No. Expit can support document processing, evidence reconciliation and accountable workflows. Your responsible officers and advisers must assess legal applicability, complete any required official submission and approve closure.
Primary references
Official sources
- Official IRU Circular 7/2026 PDF (opens in a new tab)SOURCE 01
Operative circular visually reviewed. Names and identifiers are intentionally not republished here. Review the original decision, current list and other applicable listings before changing a customer restriction. No claim is made that the listed parties remain delisted at a later date.
Read with care
Enforcement and limitations
Enforcement stated in source
The circular refers to IRU's powers under Insurance Law 125/2019 and applicable regulations/instructions. No fixed fine or individual enforcement outcome is inferred.
Limitations of this guide
Names and identifiers are intentionally not republished here. Review the original decision, current list and other applicable listings before changing a customer restriction. No claim is made that the listed parties remain delisted at a later date.