IRU Circular 19/2026 — Credit-rating decline: corrective plan and progress disclosures
IRU Circular 19/2026 adopts disclosure and corrective-plan follow-up forms for a credit-rating decline below the required minimum. A board-approved corrective plan must be submitted within 90 days of the credit-rating report, followed by implementation progress disclosures. Official sources and an evidence-led implementation checklist.
تعميم رقم (19) لسنة 2026 بشأن اعتماد نماذج الإفصاح والخطة التصحيحية ومتابعة تنفيذها في حال انخفاض التصنيف الائتماني والتقارير الدوريةOfficial Arabic title
- Issued
- 03.09.2026
- Published
- 03.09.2026
- Guide reviewed
- 11.10.2026
- Instrument
- IRU Circular 19/2026
Action at a glance
What this instrument asks you to do
IRU Circular 19/2026 adopts disclosure and corrective-plan follow-up forms for a credit-rating decline below the required minimum. A board-approved corrective plan must be submitted within 90 days of the credit-rating report, followed by implementation progress disclosures.
Source-backed
Stated legal requirements
Requirements below are attributed to the instrument or cited guidance; each item includes its source location.
- 01
Upon a below-minimum rating report, take corrective action and complete the disclosure under Annex 1.
Citation · Page 1, first two operative paragraphs
- 02
Submit a board-approved corrective plan within no more than 90 days from the rating report, including the approval meeting minutes and a timetable to improve the rating.
Citation · Page 1, second operative paragraph
- 03
Use Annex 2 to disclose progress according to the plan's dates or other dates IRU specifies, until completion and achievement of objectives.
Citation · Page 1, third operative paragraph
Dates and applicability
Timing, grace period and deadline
Timing
Signed and published 3 September. The 90-day period runs from the firm's rating report, not universally from 3 September. Progress deadlines are plan/IRU-specific.
Grace period
Only the specifically stated submission period or validity condition applies. No additional general grace period is asserted.
Expit suggested practices
Build a reviewable closure record
These suggested actions are implementation practices, not additional legal requirements.
- 01
Capture the triggering rating report and calculate the plan deadline.
- Suggested owner
- CFO / risk management
- Evidence to retain
- Rating report, applicability assessment and dated deadline calculation
- Complete when
- The trigger, responsible owner and no-more-than-90-day submission date are independently checked.
- Expit support context
- Document intake can identify reports and track dates; rating adequacy is not decided by Expit.
- 02
Obtain board approval and monitor the remedial programme.
- Suggested owner
- Board / risk committee
- Evidence to retain
- Approved plan, meeting minutes, Annex 1 submission and Annex 2 progress returns
- Complete when
- Submission and progress evidence address the rating gap, not merely the existence of a plan.
- Expit support context
- Evidence-linked tasks can monitor milestones; IRU may request changes and the firm remains accountable.
Further clarification
Frequently asked questions
Do all firms have 90 days from the circular's issue date?
No. The operative paragraph ties the plan deadline to the credit-rating report that shows the rating below the prescribed minimum.
Can Expit declare our credit-rating decline: corrective plan and progress disclosures gap closed?
No. Expit can support document processing, evidence reconciliation and accountable workflows. Your responsible officers and advisers must assess legal applicability, complete any required official submission and approve closure.
Primary references
Official sources
- Official IRU Circular 19/2026 PDF (opens in a new tab)SOURCE 01
Operative circular visually reviewed. This guide reviews the operative circular, not every field in the six annex pages or the full minimum-rating framework under Decision 1/2026. The attachment and base decision must be used for the actual return. A 90-day plan-submission period is not a blanket waiver of the rating requirement.
Read with care
Enforcement and limitations
Enforcement stated in source
The circular refers to IRU's powers under Insurance Law 125/2019 and applicable regulations/instructions. No fixed fine or individual enforcement outcome is inferred.
Limitations of this guide
This guide reviews the operative circular, not every field in the six annex pages or the full minimum-rating framework under Decision 1/2026. The attachment and base decision must be used for the actual return. A 90-day plan-submission period is not a blanket waiver of the rating requirement.